I suggest a limit on buying teamless players on 1. Seems like some fews managers (obvious who) are just refreshing the transfer market 24/7. The problem is that they are just selling the players again later and often didn’t even use them so they now lack xp. Such a waste. I’m not looking at teamless players because I can’t compete with the 24/7 online guys.

hjalager wrote :
I suggest a limit on buying teamless players on 1. Seems like some fews managers (obvious who) are just refreshing the transfer market 24/7. The problem is that they are just selling the players again later and often didn’t even use them so they now lack xp. Such a waste. I’m not looking at teamless players because I can’t compete with the 24/7 online guys.

+1.

hjalager wrote :
I suggest a limit on buying teamless players on 1. Seems like some fews managers (obvious who) are just refreshing the transfer market 24/7. The problem is that they are just selling the players again later and often didn’t even use them so they now lack xp. Such a waste. I’m not looking at teamless players because I can’t compete with the 24/7 online guys.

Tough luck. It is a strategy like any other.

Exactly. That’s why it should be regulated

hjalager wrote :
Exactly. That’s why it should be regulated

Why? Because you don't like it? I also don't like the weight that xp has on the game but you don't see me whining about it.

Accept it. It hurts less.

You seem like a big retard with really low IQ and morale so I’m not surprised you don’t understand it.

XP is a part of the ME and is the same for everyone. Here a few managers are destroying it for other managers. Easy to regulate.

hjalager wrote :
You seem like a big retard with really low IQ and morale so I’m not surprised you don’t understand it.

XP is a part of the ME and is the same for everyone. Here a few managers are destroying it for other managers. Easy to regulate.

you are been reported for offensive behavior. Hope you like to lose your team :) Kiss kiss, bye bye.

I'm sure admin would agree with me so I will be fine

hjalager wrote :
You seem like a big retard with really low IQ and morale so I’m not surprised you don’t understand it.

XP is a part of the ME and is the same for everyone. Here a few managers are destroying it for other managers. Easy to regulate.

You sound like a crybaby. If the player stays on the market without a buyer, they won't gain any XP either. If someone buys them and puts them back on the market, they have a chance to be trained and gain some XP. Besides being a crybaby, you don't know how to be contradicted without insulting your fellow players?

Marciel wrote :
You sound like a crybaby. If the player stays on the market without a buyer, they won't gain any XP either. If someone buys them and puts them back on the market, they have a chance to be trained and gain some XP. Besides being a crybaby, you don't know how to be contradicted without insulting your fellow players?

Could you or Portman participate in a discussion without insulting the thread starter? Unbelievable how low the level is. There is even one who agrees with me. And have you even read my post? Often they are not put on transfer market right away. The suggestion makes it possible for everyone to get a teamless player and not just those who look at transfer market every 10th minut

So you should spend more time in the transfer market instead of wasting your time crying or calling your teammates retarded. In any field, whoever has more time to dedicate has an advantage. I am against quotas for crybabies.

Now you wrote crybaby three times in two posts. Great contribution for someone who bats me for insulting other in a forum. And SlySpy/Portman is not a teammate. He's the type who joins loan club and puts up own players but do not bid on the assigned players. He's the type calling people IRL pathetic loosers. He's the type playing smart but deosnt even understand basic economics. He is a retard.

Come on and cry, cry baby
Cry baby, cry
Cry baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Love this song. ahhahahah

And yes, you are losing your team. Hope that all this whining has worth it ;) Your team sucks anyway, so you won't lose much ;) ;) ;)

kiss kiss bye bye

Yeah we see the true face. If I would loose my team you would’ve lost yours long time ago. I guess you have some warnings in the bank so I guess if someone is banned now it must be you. Bye

I propose that for players without a team a bid be opened as for any player. This way it is more difficult for the usual players to take the best.
Besides, I still don't understand why so many coaches fire 5/5 players..... if it is not a tactic to allow "friends" to take them as free agents.

Who fires 5/5? Lol are you insane?

SlySpy wrote :
Who fires 5/5? Lol are you insane?

moderate your words, you are not my brother

karlacci wrote :

SlySpy wrote :
Who fires 5/5? Lol are you insane?

moderate your words, you are not my brother

Good for me. I understand English is not your first language but my words are ok. Sorry if you miss same English classes 😉

Personally, I see no reason why those that put the time and effort into scouting those free agents coming onto the market shouldn’t then benefit from signing them if they happen to be good players. The more work these managers put in the more likely they are to find a star player. I would love to be able to sign lots of 5/5 players but I don’t have the time to scout every free agent as soon as they hit the market, but I’m not going to hold it against those that do put the effort in. From what I’ve seen it’s not like they are getting lots of 16yo 5/5 players anyway, more often than not they’re partially trained players with low xp that need a lot of work for them to reach their potential so their market value is restricted somewhat. As long as the game is active and continuing then I see no reason for people to have a big issue with the current system, but that’s just my opinion and apologies if it offends anyone!

Jamie Best wrote :
Personally, I see no reason why those that put the time and effort into scouting those free agents coming onto the market shouldn’t then benefit from signing them if they happen to be good players. The more work these managers put in the more likely they are to find a star player. I would love to be able to sign lots of 5/5 players but I don’t have the time to scout every free agent as soon as they hit the market, but I’m not going to hold it against those that do put the effort in. From what I’ve seen it’s not like they are getting lots of 16yo 5/5 players anyway, more often than not they’re partially trained players with low xp that need a lot of work for them to reach their potential so their market value is restricted somewhat. As long as the game is active and continuing then I see no reason for people to have a big issue with the current system, but that’s just my opinion and apologies if it offends anyone!

I agree